Spring 2021
CHECK THIS PAGE FREQUENTLY. Some of this stuff is preliminary and I will likely update, add, drop things as we go along.
I will update reading assignments at least one week in advance of when we'll discuss them in class. I'll also try to remind you in class -- but it's also your job to check here.
Origins of
Agriculture,: big picture. How did environment interact
with the phenomenon of ag origins?
From Diamond, Guns,
Germs, and Steel: (prepare as much as you can by Monday; we'll
continue with this material through the week)
- Prologue and Part 1 (Chs. 1-3):
Treat this as background; read it for general framing. We won't
spend lots of time in class dissecting it, but DO bring any questions or
comments that arise as you read.
- Part 2, Chs. 4-7: Read these
chapters closely; consider the questions Diamond is asking, the arguments
he's framing, how they're he supports them -- what kinds of evidence does
he use? what kinds of assumptions does he make? And so
on. We'll spend time with this material
READINGS FOR DISCUSSION 1-4 MAR
CONTINUE in Diamond: Chs. 7-11
READINGS FOR DISCUSSION 8-18 MAR (no
class on Thurs 11th)
Some readings that follow up on Diamond's global
arguments and address some particular pieces of the story: Focal
questions: What CONSTRAINS initial development of ag? What PROMOTES it?
- for Monday 8th and
into 15th:
- prepare, Richerson et al. 2001. Was
Agriculture Impossible during the Pleistocene but Mandatory during the
Holocene? A Climate Change Hypothesis. American
Antiquity 66:387-411 (NOTE
that this is a longish paper and, in parts, rather dense/technical.
DON'T GET BOGGED DOWN in the technical/math stuff (unless you want to); DO FOCUS on the overarching
arguments. DO USE the graphs to help understand the argument. AND
FRAME QUESTIONS to bring to class.
- and Wood, D., & Lenné, J. M. 2018. A natural adaptive syndrome as a model for the origins of cereal agriculture. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1875).
FOR THESE, in addition to the usual approach to readings,
give particular thought to how these do or don't relate to Diamond's
arguments.
(OPTIONAL: Totally up to you, but, if you're interested in socioeconomic
side of this story, here's one of a number of papers proposing deep ties
between adoption of agriculture and emergence of private property,
capitalism, etc.. Bowles and Choi. 2013. Coevolution
of farming and private property during the early Holocene. Proceedings
of the national Academy of Sciences 110:8830-8835.)
- For Mon. 15th and
Thurs 18th:
- Ruddiman, W. 2005. How
did humans first alter global climate? Scientific American 2005,
March, pp46-53
(and a more technical
development of this argument: Scan this and read in detail as you
wish for follow-up: Ruddiman, W. 2003. The anthropogenic greenhouse era
began thousaqnds of years ago. Climatic Change 61: 261–293)
READINGS FOR WEEK OF 22-25 MARCH:
Episode 1: MesopotamiansRunnels, C. N. 1995. Environmental Degradation in Ancient Greece. Scientific American.
Benson, et al. 2006. Anasazi migrations during the middle-12th and late-13th centuries... Climatic Change
FOR 8 APRIL (probably spilling into next week)
Episodes 5 and 6: Early predecessors of
EuroAmerican agriculture
Dupouey et al.. 2002. Irreversible
impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity. Ecology
83:2978-2984. NOTE that there are some fancy statistics here; do not
worry too much over them. DO make sure have general understanding of Fig.
2 andTable 1. Researchers use something called 'factorial analysis'
to analyze differences in plant communities; all you need to know is that
this analysis produces 'scores' for study plots, and the more difference
the score between plots, the less similar their vegetation.
Dockrill and Bond 2009. Sustainability
and Resilience in Prehistoric North Atlantic Britain: The Importance
of a Mixed Paleoeconomic System. Journal of the NorthAtlantic. 2:33-50.
(Shorter than it looks; several full-page graphics, and several
pages of appendix; focus
on the Discussion section and the basic story-line and logic --
do not worry too much about the archeological details. You can thank
a class member for this one...)
WHAT DO THESE TWO
SYSTEMS HAVE IN COMMON? Is it appropriate to look at the
Shetland/Orkney situation as 'sustainable'?
FOR WEEK OF 12-15 APRIL
NEW ENGLAND!
Great
Meadow, Chs 1-2
Changes in the Land,
Chs 1-2
FOR WEEK OF 19-22 APRIL
Great
Meadow Chs 3-4
Changes in the Land
Chs 3-4
FOR 26 APRIL (no AM classes 29 April)
Great
Meadow Chs 7-8
FOR WEEK OF 3-6 MAY
Raup, H. 1966 (reprinted 1997) The
view from John Sanderson's farm. Forest History (now 'Forest History
Today)
Use the FIRST
FIVE FIGURES at this web-site to support your reading (this is work
from Harvard Forest, whichincludes what was Sanderson's Farm, and is
a site of much land-use history research; you may wish to check out the Harvard Forest website...
Another perspective and change of pace: Two
chapters from Laura Ingalls Wilder, Farmer Boy
(1933)
Flinn, K. and M. Vellend. 2005. Recovery of forest plant communities in post-agricultural landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment. 3:243-250 (Consider what the findings reported in this article say about the broader concept of 'sustainability' in agriculture...)
FOR WEEK OF 10-13 MAY
Present to Future:
Read this for general understanding; some parts are relatively
technical.
Erb, K.-H., F. Krausmann, V. Gaube, S. Gingrich, A. Bondeau, M.
Fischer-Kowalski, and H. Haberl. 2009. Analyzing
the global human appropriation of net primary production —
processes, trajectories, implications. An introduction. Ecological
Economics 69:250–259. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.001.
Tilman et al. 2002. Agricultural
sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature
418:671-677
LOOK AT THESE if interested in further background info:
From NASA's
'SEDAC'
Program (Give thought to implications OF THE THIRD MAP in
particular)
And a
more general reference on this topic from The Encyclopedia of Earth
-- should help with some terminology/concept
AND, here's the article Erb et al. refer to a lot; refer to it as interest
dictates:
Haberl, H., K. H. Erb, F. Krausmann, V. Gaube, A. Bondeau, C. Plutzar, S.
Gingrich, W. Lucht, and M. Fischer-Kowalski. 2007. Quantifying
and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth’s
terrestrial ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 104:12942.
FOR WEEK OF 17-20 MAY: Focus on METHODS (plant breeding,
tillage...)
Some readings about potential futures for agricultural crops, plant breeding, GMO use, different farming methods, etc.
Two reviews of a book, Tomorrow's Table: Organic Farming, Genetics, and the Future of Food, by Pamela Ronald and Raoul Adamchak (one a 'genetic engineer', one an organic farmer -- and they are a couple) from PLOS and from Science. They're short; read them both...
And an article comparing yields and yield stability in 'organic' and 'conservation' agriculture (this one has technical bits; FOCUS on INTRO, FIGURES, and scan DISCUSSION. ALSO consider definitions of 'organic', 'conventional', and 'conservation' ag methods: Knapp and van der Heijden. 2018. A global meta-analysis of yield stability in organic and conservation agriculture. Nature Communications
A TED talk by Steward Brand -- One of the founder's of Earth Day and editor of the first Whole-EarthCatalogue, who now argues that the organic farming movement should embrace genetic engineering as a tool... Here's a NY Times column that talks about Brand's 2010 book, Whole-Earth Discipline. And here's another from The Guardian: read/view at least one, but they're both short.
Popkin, Gabriel, 2020. Can 'carbon smart' farming play a key role in the climate fight? YaleEnvironment360. Good discussion of the complexities of carbon sequestration in agriculture; it's not a simple story...
National Academies of Science. The
Impact of Genetically Engineered Crops on Farm Sustainability in the
United States. [READ this short synopsis of a book-length
analysis; the whole thing is accessible
for free on line. There's also a more recent (2016)
update freely downloadable here.]
A couple of supplementary piece for follow-up if you're interested:
Conniff, Richard. 2012. In
fast-track technology, hope for a second green revolution.
YaleEnvironment360 (talks about new approaches to plant breeding that are
different from GMO, but still allow more rapid development)
Snow. A.A.
et al. 2005. Genetically
engineered organisms and the environment: current status and
recommendations. Ecological Applications 15:377-404 (This
is
an officially sanctioned 'white paper' produced by the EcologicalSociety
of America: longish, but not as long as it might seem at first --
lots of 'boxes' and so forth)
FOR WEEK OF 24-27 MAY: Focus on broader conservation
implications
Reconciling growing more food with organic methods, biodiversity conservation, and taming greenhouse warming
Several short readings.
Laurance, W. 2014. Will
increased food production devour tropical forest lands?
YaleEnvironment360
Ramankutty, N., and J. Rhemtulla. 2012. Can intensive farming save nature? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10:455–455.
Pearce, Fred. 2018. Sparing vs. Sharing: the great debate over how to protect nature. YaleEnvironment360
And one slightly longer one.
Hunter et al. 2017. Agriculture in 2050: Recalibrating Targets for Sustainable Intensification. Bioscience.
FINALLY:
Check out the Project Drawdown website; look at a couple of their ideas for reducing greenhouse emissions in the agriculture, food, and land-use sector at: https://www.drawdown.org/sectors/food-agriculture-land-use